LAB 1B ยท 75 MIN ยท NO CODE
Build a Break Triage Agent & Flow
Go deeper: build a Reconciliation Break Triage Chat Agent, iterate it twice, test it, generate a disposition memo, wrap it in a Flow, then connect a real public MCP.
๐ฏ What You'll Build
A Break Triage Agent that classifies reconciliation exceptions by type and severity and drafts a disposition note for a human preparer โ never clearing a break on its own โ then wrap it in a Flow and connect a real, public, no-auth MCP server for a live data lookup.
๐ช Part 1 โ Build the Agent
- Create the Break Triage Agent with a natural-language brief: classify each break by type (timing, missing entry, duplicate, FX mismatch) and severity, draft a disposition note citing the source line, and never auto-clear a break.
- Test it against a sample reconciliation export with at least 3 different break types.
๐ Part 2 โ Iterate Twice
- Add a capability: have it also flag any break open for more than 2 consecutive cycles as requiring escalation.
- Add a guardrail: explicitly instruct it to never estimate a severity threshold not defined in the reconciliation procedure โ it must say "not defined in the procedure" instead.
๐ Part 3 โ Generate a Disposition Memo
Ask the agent to produce a formatted disposition memo for one flagged break, with named sections (Break Description, Classification, Source Citation, Recommended Next Step) โ confirm it never recommends "clear" as the next step.
๐ Part 4 โ Wrap in a Flow
- Create a Flow: Agent Step (run Break Triage) โ Decision Branch (escalate if severity = high) โ Document Generation (disposition memo) โ Human Approval Gate (preparer sign-off).
- Schedule the Flow to run each business morning.
๐ Part 5 โ Connect a Real Public MCP
Connect a real, publicly available, no-auth MCP server (e.g., a public reference-data or documentation MCP) to give the agent a live lookup capability, and confirm the agent cites the live tool call in its output rather than a stale document value.
โ
Success Criteria
- The agent never auto-clears a break in any test
- Both iterations (capability + guardrail) are demonstrably reflected in a test run
- The disposition memo has named sections and a clear, non-approving "next step"
- The Flow includes a working Human Approval Gate
- The MCP-sourced value in agent output is distinguishable from a document-sourced value